Quick Decision Summary
60Hz has been the gaming standard for decades and remains perfectly playable for most casual gaming scenarios. The question isn't whether 60Hz "works"—it does—but whether higher refresh rates would meaningfully improve your specific gaming experience.
- 60Hz works well for: Turn-based games, RPGs, strategy, puzzle, simulation, story-focused games
- 60Hz shows limitations in: Fast-paced shooters, racing games, anything with quick camera movement
- Key factor: Your sensitivity to motion smoothness and whether you play competitively
The gaming community often presents 144Hz as mandatory, but this perspective usually comes from competitive FPS players. If you play casually, your needs differ significantly.
Recommended Products
Based on our testing, here are some top picks:
LG 32GN650-B Ultragear Gaming Monitor -
ASUS ROG Swift OLED 27" Gaming Monitor -
$799.00
Samsung Odyssey G7 Gaming Monitor -
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE 4K Monitor -
$612.99
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Console gaming operated at 30-60fps for most of its history, and millions of players enjoyed those experiences. The relevant question isn't whether higher is better—it objectively is—but whether it's better enough to justify the cost for your gaming habits.
Game Genre Breakdown: Where 60Hz Matters
Turn-Based and Strategy Games
Civilization, XCOM, Divinity, card games, puzzle games. These genres have minimal motion where refresh rate matters. You could play at 30Hz without noticing during gameplay.
Verdict: 60Hz is fully adequate. Higher refresh provides no gameplay benefit.
Story-Focused RPGs and Adventures
Baldur's Gate 3, Final Fantasy, adventure games. Combat may have some action, but the focus is on story and exploration. 60fps provides smooth enough experience for immersion.
Verdict: 60Hz works well. 144Hz offers marginal improvement in action sequences.
Action RPGs and Third-Person Games
Elden Ring, God of War, Witcher 3. Combat involves fast movement, but these games are designed for controller play at 60fps. You're not at a competitive disadvantage.
Verdict: 60Hz is the design target. Higher refresh feels smoother but isn't necessary.
Racing and Sports Games
Fast lateral movement benefits from higher refresh. The sense of speed feels more realistic at 144Hz. 60Hz is playable but noticeably choppier during quick turns.
Verdict: 60Hz works but higher refresh noticeably improves experience.
Competitive FPS Games
Valorant, CS2, Apex Legends, Fortnite. Fast mouse movement, target tracking, and quick reactions all benefit from higher refresh. You're at a measurable disadvantage against 144Hz+ players.
Verdict: 60Hz is a competitive handicap. Upgrade recommended if you play ranked modes.
How to Decide if This is Right for You
- Good fit if: You primarily play single-player games, strategy, or RPGs. You're not sensitive to motion smoothness. You're on a tight budget. Your GPU can't push high framerates anyway.
- Not ideal if: You play competitive multiplayer shooters and care about ranking. You've experienced 144Hz and found 60Hz noticeably worse. Fast camera movement in games feels choppy to you.
- What to compare: The price difference to 144Hz (often only $50-100 now). Whether your GPU can sustain 144fps. Your gaming time split between casual and competitive genres.
Tradeoffs and Limitations
The perception issue: Once you've used 144Hz, 60Hz often feels noticeably choppy. If you've never experienced higher refresh, you don't know what you're missing—which can be an advantage if budget is tight.
GPU matching: A 144Hz monitor only helps if your GPU can produce 144fps. If you're running a budget GPU at 60fps anyway, a 144Hz monitor provides no benefit during gameplay.
Input lag consideration: 60Hz monitors have slightly higher input lag by nature (16.67ms frame time vs 6.94ms at 144Hz). For casual play this rarely matters, but competitive players feel the difference.
Future-proofing: As you upgrade your GPU over time, a 144Hz monitor will age better than 60Hz. The price gap has narrowed enough that 144Hz often makes sense as a longer-term investment.
Common Mistakes When Choosing Refresh Rate
Buying 144Hz when your GPU can't use it
A 144Hz monitor showing 60fps looks identical to a 60Hz monitor at 60fps. Match monitor to realistic GPU performance.
Assuming all gaming benefits equally
Turn-based strategy players gain nothing from 144Hz. Don't pay for features your games can't use.
Ignoring other specifications
A 60Hz IPS panel may serve you better than a 144Hz TN panel if color and viewing angles matter for your use.
Following competitive advice for casual play
Reddit and forums skew toward competitive gamers. Their priorities may not match casual gaming needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will I notice the difference between 60Hz and 144Hz?
Most people notice the difference when moving windows or in fast-paced games. The difference is less apparent in slower games. Individual sensitivity varies.
Is 60Hz bad for gaming?
No. Console gaming has been 60fps or lower for decades. 60Hz is the baseline that games are designed around. It's not bad—higher refresh is just smoother.
Should I get 60Hz now and upgrade later?
Given how close 144Hz pricing is to 60Hz today, it's often better to buy 144Hz upfront rather than buying twice. The price gap has narrowed significantly.
Does 60Hz cause motion sickness?
Some users report that lower refresh rates contribute to motion discomfort, particularly in VR or first-person games. If you're sensitive, higher refresh may help.
Is 75Hz a good middle ground?
75Hz provides a small improvement over 60Hz. It's better than nothing but not as noticeable as the jump to 144Hz. If 75Hz costs the same as 60Hz, take it.
Do console players need more than 60Hz?
PS5 and Xbox Series X support 120Hz in some games. If you play console games with 120fps modes, a 120Hz+ monitor makes sense. Otherwise, 60Hz matches most console output.